Guess which company refuses to comment to the National Press about a 4 year old court case?

One of the National newspapers is onto this AIM listed company and wants to run a piece. But the company is refusing to comment on this case which took place 5 years ago and which saw its Executive chairman claim under oath that shareholders funds were paid to a Dentist which meant that his personal liability to that dentist was cleared.

Have you guessed which company yet? Why can’t that company just deny the story? Answers on a postcard to the AIM regulation department please.